Re: readability changes to postgres.sgml

On 8/16/19 10:41 AM, Liudmila Mantrova wrote:
>
>
>     For what it's worth, I think the proposed changes are all solid
>     improvements. The text reads better with them, and that's what
>     this is
>     about -- not whether the removed little text-pieces were 'true' or
>     not.
>
> If we want to make these intros more concise, one of the easiest ways 
> to achieve this is to address the reader directly ("Readers looking 
> for xxx are encouraged to look" vs. smth like "For xxx, see").

This is true and my counter argument is that a call to action is more 
likely to get the reader to do something.

JD


-- 
Command Prompt, Inc. || http://the.postgres.company/ || @cmdpromptinc
Postgres centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Advocate: @amplifypostgres || Get help: https://commandprompt.com/
*****     Unless otherwise stated, opinions are my own.   *****