Re: Question about where to deploy the business logics for data processing
От
Adrian Klaver
Тема
Re: Question about where to deploy the business logics for data processing
Дата
Msg-id
a2f8b681-ab33-3c0e-c37d-b020fec86670@aklaver.com
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Question about where to deploy the business logics for data processing Nim Li <mr.nim.li@gmail.com>
Re: Question about where to deploy the business logics for data processing Rob Sargent <robjsargent@gmail.com>
Re: Question about where to deploy the business logics for data processing Michael Nolan <htfoot@gmail.com>
Re: Question about where to deploy the business logics for data processing Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>
Re: Question about where to deploy the business logics for data processing Lorusso Domenico <domenico.l76@gmail.com>
Re: Question about where to deploy the business logics for data processing Lorusso Domenico <domenico.l76@gmail.com>
Re: Question about where to deploy the business logics for data processing Nim Li <mr.nim.li@gmail.com>
Re: Question about where to deploy the business logics for data processing Ron <ronljohnsonjr@gmail.com>
Re: Question about where to deploy the business logics for data processing Michael Nolan <htfoot@gmail.com>
Re: Question about where to deploy the business logics for data processing Guyren Howe <guyren@gmail.com>
Re: Question about where to deploy the business logics for data processing Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>
On 6/9/23 11:36, Nim Li wrote: > Hello, > > Thank you so so much for all the feedback so far. :D > > About this comment: > > > "... an application that requires changing the data model does not > seem to be well designed...don't allow model change by the business > logic..." > > I work in a science research faculity. When researchers start a > project, they don't necessary get the full picture of what they are > hoping to achive (yet they may get some ideas about the starting point > that allow them to move forward) By the time they see 40% percent of > what they have done, they may start to have a different thought and move > towards a different direction, or in some cases, they may spin it off to > something different after a certain period of time Coming with my Agile > Development mindset in the research area, it is common for me to see > users changing their requirement and expectation, with the same buckets > for the data. Yes, there is quite a lot of work to keep the researchers > happy. ;-) > > I suppose when there is a specific end-goal to achive for a project, a > more specific design can be more feasible based on the goal. But when > the end-goal is not necessary clear, and/or change-able, I am not > exactly clear how we may draw a black-and-white line to determine a > design is good or not (.. and for how long...) > Seems to me you are looking for a two part set up: 1) A experiment play ground where ideas and processes can be tested out in a more free form manner. Some example software I have used or experimented with that can fill that role: Pandas https://pandas.pydata.org/ Duckdb https://duckdb.org/ Polars https://pola-rs.github.io/polars-book/ 2) Once something that resembles a solid plan has been developed then move to Postgres or not. -- Adrian Klaver adrian.klaver@aklaver.com
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления
От: Guyren Howe
Дата:
От: Michael Nolan
Дата: