Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Asking for OK for a nasty trick to resolve PG CVE-2025-1094 i

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Laurenz Albe
Тема Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Asking for OK for a nasty trick to resolve PG CVE-2025-1094 i
Дата
Msg-id a141ae990b72eadcdbcf79efaa268ac5696f7bdb.camel@cybertec.at
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Asking for OK for a nasty trick to resolve PG CVE-2025-1094 i  ("Abraham, Danny" <danny_abraham@bmc.com>)
Список pgsql-general
On Thu, 2025-03-06 at 09:33 +0000, Abraham, Danny wrote:
> We have hundreds of pg servers (mainly linux).
> App is 7×24.
> We think that patching the server to 15.12.will cost about 30 times
> more compared to patching the pg client ( mainly qa effort).

I don't think so.  Don't do any QA when installing a PostgreSQL patch
(just roll it out on the test systems first to see if your installation
procedure works).

Down time because of data corruption will cost *way* more than patching.

Yours,
Laurenz Albe



В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: