Re: Are there performance advantages in storing bulky field in separate table?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Ian Mayo
Тема Re: Are there performance advantages in storing bulky field in separate table?
Дата
Msg-id a0a470f10904081230v69941510q9857c9aaa7bed63b@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Are there performance advantages in storing bulky field in separate table?  (Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>)
Ответы Re: Are there performance advantages in storing bulky field in separate table?  (Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>)
Список pgsql-general
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 8:13 PM, Robert Treat
<xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> Maybe I've been reading too much Pascal again lately, but if only 1% of your
> rows are going to have data in this column, personally, I'd put it in a
> separate table.

thanks for that Robert - it does match my (completely groundless)
first impression.

In the nature of debate, would you mind passing on the pascal-related
reasons why you'd put the data in another table?

cheers,
Ian

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Steve Crawford
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Table has 22 million records, but backup doesn't see them
Следующее
От: "James B. Byrne"
Дата:
Сообщение: No return from trigger function