Re: fascinating article on postgresql mailing lists
| От | Daniel Verite |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: fascinating article on postgresql mailing lists |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | a05666d8-30a9-4aae-aaa2-2d839acbe292@mm обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: fascinating article on postgresql mailing lists (Vincent Veyron <vv.lists@wanadoo.fr>) |
| Ответы |
Re: fascinating article on postgresql mailing lists
Re: fascinating article on postgresql mailing lists |
| Список | pgsql-general |
Vincent Veyron wrote: > I find it strange that > > 'Probability that a new thread gets a response' > > sits below 60% for the 'general' list This seems indeed too low. I happen to collect these messages in a database since mid-2005. As a point of comparison, the numbers I get until today for pgsql-general are 3348 messages that appear to be outside of any thread (no "In-Reply-To" field or "References" field that points to it, and subject does not start with "Re:"), the total number of messages being 110233, in 19855 distinct threads. So at least in this time period, I can't see how it could be said that there's a 40% probability of not getting a reply. If we consider that there are 3348 failed attempts at spawning a thread vs 19855 successful attempts, the ratio would be about 6:1, or a 17% probability of getting no public response. Best regards, -- Daniel PostgreSQL-powered mail user agent and storage: http://www.manitou-mail.org
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: