Re: problematic query (for me ;-)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
Искать
От
Bjarke Dahl Ebert
Тема
Re: problematic query (for me ;-)
Дата
Msg-id
_Nx9a.112430$Hl6.10266647@news010.worldonline.dk
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Re: problematic query (for me ;-) [solved? - sorry to bother] Kim Petersen <kp@kyborg.dk>
"Kim Petersen"  wrote in message
news:3E660A41.7040509@kyborg.dk...
> I'm trying to get a hint as to how i can solve this problem:
>
> i have a table:
>
>   n | t
> ---+---
>   1 | 2
>   1 | 5
>   2 | 3
>   2 | 5
>   3 | 4
>   3 | 3
> (6 rows)
>
> now i want to find the pairs (n1,n2) where no t's collide - eg in this
> table it would be (1,3) and (3,1).

SELECT DISTINCT nt1.n, nt2.n FROM nt nt1, nt nt2
WHERE NOT EXISTS (   (SELECT t from nt where n=nt1.n) INTERSECT   (SELECT t from nt where n=nt2.n))
n | n
---+---1 | 33 |1
(2 rows)

I'm not sure that it scales well to large datasets...

/Bjarke




В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления
От: Kim Petersen
Дата:
Сообщение: problematic query (for me ;-)
От: Ninonard Policarpio
Дата:
FAQ