Re: Should rolpassword be toastable?

On Sat, Sep 21, 2024 at 03:25:54PM -0500, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> Thanks for reviewing.  I went ahead and committed 0002 since it seems like
> there's consensus on that one.  I've attached a rebased version of 0001
> with s/characters/bytes.

For the reasons discussed upthread [0], I can't bring myself to add an
arbitrary limit to the password hash length.  I am going to leave 0001
uncommitted for now.

[0] https://postgr.es/m/Zu2eT2H8OT3OXauc%40nathan

-- 
nathan