Re: Partitioned tables and [un]loggedness

On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 09:42:31AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 09, 2024 at 03:56:14PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> How about inventing a new ATT_PARTITIONED_TABLE and make a clean split
>> between both relkinds?  I'd guess that blocking both SET LOGGED and
>> UNLOGGED for partitioned tables is the best move, even if it is
>> possible to block only one or the other, of course.
> 
> I gave it a try, and while it is much more invasive, it is also much
> more consistent with the rest of the file.

This looks reasonable to me.  Could we also use ATT_PARTITIONED_TABLE to
remove the partitioned table check in ATExecAddIndexConstraint()?

-- 
nathan