Re: Cross-version Compatibility of postgres_fdw
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Cross-version Compatibility of postgres_fdw |
Дата | |
Msg-id | ZsPbWlXLova1ApZQ@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Cross-version Compatibility of postgres_fdw (Etsuro Fujita <etsuro.fujita@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Cross-version Compatibility of postgres_fdw
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at 03:25:48AM +0900, Etsuro Fujita wrote: > On Tue, Aug 13, 2024 at 12:15 PM Fujii Masao > <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com> wrote: > > On 2024/08/09 17:49, Etsuro Fujita wrote: > > > I just thought consolidating the information to one place would make > > > the documentation more readable. > > > > Yes, so I think that adding a note about the required remote server version > > to the cross-version compatibility section would be more intuitive. > > This section already discusses the necessary server versions and limitations. > > Patch attached. > > Thanks for the patch! > > I noticed that we already have mentioned such a version limitation on > the analyze_sampling option outside that section (see the description > for that option in the “Cost Estimation Options” section). So my > concern is that it might be inconsistent to state only the INSERT > limitation there. Maybe I am too worried about that. I think it is an improvement, so applied to master. Thanks. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> https://momjian.us EDB https://enterprisedb.com Only you can decide what is important to you.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: