Re: Restart pg_usleep when interrupted

On Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 05:35:08PM -0500, Imseih (AWS), Sami wrote:
>> Skimming the last few messages of that thread [0], it looks like Bertrand
>> is exploring ways to avoid so many interrupts.  I guess the unavoidable
>> question is whether this work is still worthwhile given that improvement.
>
> The way the instrumentation in [0] dealt with interrupts was too complex,
> which is why it seemed better to handle the restart the remainder of the
> sleep in the sleep function

Can you elaborate on how it is too complex?

-- 
nathan