Re: walsender.c comment with no context is hard to understand
От | Bertrand Drouvot |
---|---|
Тема | Re: walsender.c comment with no context is hard to understand |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Zot7UVF+gY71dDoQ@ip-10-97-1-34.eu-west-3.compute.internal обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: walsender.c comment with no context is hard to understand (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: walsender.c comment with no context is hard to understand
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi, On Mon, Jul 08, 2024 at 08:46:19AM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote: > This sounds better but it is better to add just before we determine > am_cascading_walsender as is done in the attached. What do you think? Thanks! LGTM. > > BTW, is it possible that the promotion gets completed after we wait > for the required WAL and before assigning am_cascading_walsender? Yeah, I don't think there is anything that would prevent a promotion to happen and complete here. I did a few tests (pausing the walsender with gdb at various places and promoting the standby). > think even if that happens we can correctly determine the required > timeline because all the required WAL is already available, is that > correct Yeah that's correct. Regards, -- Bertrand Drouvot PostgreSQL Contributors Team RDS Open Source Databases Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: