Re: Avoid orphaned objects dependencies, take 3
От | Bertrand Drouvot |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Avoid orphaned objects dependencies, take 3 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | ZnvsaVGqd4wI9vJ+@ip-10-97-1-34.eu-west-3.compute.internal обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Avoid orphaned objects dependencies, take 3 (Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Avoid orphaned objects dependencies, take 3
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi, On Fri, Jun 21, 2024 at 01:22:43PM +0000, Bertrand Drouvot wrote: > Another thought for the RelationRelationId class case: we could check if there > is a lock first and if there is no lock then acquire one. That way that would > ensure the relation is always locked (so no "risk" anymore), but OTOH it may > add "unecessary" locking (see 2. mentioned previously). Please find attached v12 implementing this idea for the RelationRelationId class case. As mentioned, it may add unnecessary locking for 2. but I think that's worth it to ensure that we are always on the safe side of thing. This idea is implemented in LockNotPinnedObjectById(). A few remarks: - there is one place where the relation is not visible (even if CommandCounterIncrement() is used). That's in TypeCreate(), because the new relation Oid is _not_ added to pg_class yet. Indeed, in heap_create_with_catalog(), AddNewRelationType() is called before AddNewRelationTuple()). I put a comment in this part of the code explaining why it's not necessary to call LockRelationOid() here. - some namespace related stuff is removed from "test_oat_hooks/expected/alter_table.out". That's due to the logic in cachedNamespacePath() and the fact that the same namespace related stuff is added prior in alter_table.out. - the patch touches 37 .c files, but that's mainly due to the fact that LockNotPinnedObjectById() has to be called in a lot of places. Regards, -- Bertrand Drouvot PostgreSQL Contributors Team RDS Open Source Databases Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: