Re: improve predefined roles documentation

On Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 02:44:33PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> I think the first two cases could be made more like each other by
> changing the varlistentires that are just about one setting to use the
> second format instead of the first, e.g. pg_checkpoint allows
> executing the CHECKPOINT command.

Done.

> I don't know what to do about pg_database_owner. I almost wonder if
> that should be moved out of the table and documented as a special
> case. Or maybe some more wordsmithing would add clarity. Or maybe it's
> fine as-is.

I've left it alone for now.  I thought about adding something like
"pg_database_owner does not provide any special capabilities or access
out-of-the-box" to the beginning of the entry, but I don't have time at the
moment to properly wordsmith the rest.  If anyone else wants to give it a
try before I get to it (probably tomorrow), please be my guest.  TBH I
think the existing content is pretty good, so I'm not opposed to leaving it
alone, even if the style is different than the other entries.

-- 
nathan