Re: RFC: Additional Directory for Extensions
От | Nathan Bossart |
---|---|
Тема | Re: RFC: Additional Directory for Extensions |
Дата | |
Msg-id | ZnmavuKNNJLDRq7I@nathan обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: RFC: Additional Directory for Extensions ("David E. Wheeler" <david@justatheory.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: RFC: Additional Directory for Extensions
Re: RFC: Additional Directory for Extensions |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 01:52:26PM -0400, David E. Wheeler wrote: > I realize this probably isn´t going to happen for 17, given the freeze, > but I would very much welcome feedback and pointers to address concerns > about providing a second directory for extensions and DSOs. Quite a few > people have talked about the need for this in the Extension Mini > Summits[1], so I´m sure I could get some collaborators to make > improvements or look at a different approach. At first glance, the general idea seems reasonable to me. I'm wondering whether there is a requirement for this directory to be prepended or if it could be appended to the end. That way, the existing ones would take priority, which might be desirable from a security standpoint. -- nathan
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: