Re: First draft of PG 17 release notes

On Tue, May 28, 2024 at 02:44:28PM +1200, David Rowley wrote:
> On Sun, 26 May 2024 at 15:57, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> > Agreed.  I changed it to:
> >
> >         Allow btree indexes to more efficiently find a set of values, such as
> >         those supplied by IN subqueries
> >
> > Is that good?
> 
> I think this needs further adjustment.  An "IN subquery" is an IN
> clause which contains a subquery.  As far as I understand it,
> 5bf748b86 does nothing to improve those. It's there to improve IN with
> a set of values such as IN(1,2,3).
> 
> Maybe "IN subqueries" can be replaced with "an SQL IN clause".

Okay, I went with:

    Allow btree indexes to more efficiently find a set of values,
    such as those supplied by IN clauses using constants (Peter Geoghegan,
    Matthias van de Meent)


-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        https://momjian.us
  EDB                                      https://enterprisedb.com

  Only you can decide what is important to you.