Re: Underscore in positional parameters?
| От | Michael Paquier |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Underscore in positional parameters? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | Zkafn08nGVU2ucaC@paquier.xyz обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Underscore in positional parameters? (Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Underscore in positional parameters?
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 08:41:11AM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On this specific patch, maybe reword "parameter too large" to "parameter > number too large". WFM here. > Also, I was bemused by the use of atol(), which is notoriously unportable > (sizeof(long)). So I poked around and found more places that might need > fixing. I'm attaching a patch here with annotations too look at later. Yeah atoXX calls have been funky in the tree for some time. This reminds this thread, somewhat: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CALAY4q8be6Qw_2J%3DzOp_v1X-zfMBzvVMkAfmMYv%3DUkr%3D2hPcFQ%40mail.gmail.com The issue is also that there is no "safe" parsing alternative for 64b integers in the frontend (as you know long is 32b in Windows, which is why I'd encourage ripping it out as much as we can). This may be better as a complementary of strtoint() in src/common/string.c. Note as well strtoint64() in pgbench.c. I think I have a patch lying around, actually.. -- Michael
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: