On Mon, Apr 08, 2024 at 10:36:41PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> We *should* do this sometime before branching v17, but I'm not
> in any hurry. My thought here is that some of these late changes
> might end up getting reverted, in which case touching those files
> would add a bit more complexity to the revert. We can do this
> sort of mechanical cleanup after the probability of reversion has
> declined a bit.
>
> (On the same logic, I'm resisting the temptation to do a tree-wide
> pgindent right away. Yeah, the tree is indent-clean according to
> the current contents of src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list, but that
> hasn't been maintained with great accuracy, so we'll need an
> update and then a pgindent run at some point.)
The perl code in the tree has gathered dust, on the contrary ;)
I would suggest to also wait until we're clearer with the situation
for all these mechanical changes, which I suspect is going to take 1~2
weeks at least.
--
Michael