Re: pgsql: Track last_inactive_time in pg_replication_slots.

Hi,

On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 08:59:55PM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 8:46 PM Bertrand Drouvot
> <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 08:38:16PM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> > > On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 7:51 PM Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 10:02 AM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > We considered the other two names as last_inactive_at and
> > > > > last_active_time. For the first (last_inactive_at), there was an
> > > > > argument that most other fields that display time ends with _time. For
> > > > > the second (last_active_time), there was an argument that it could be
> > > > > misleading as one could think that it should be updated each time WAL
> > > > > record decoding is happening [1]. The other possibility is to name it
> > > > > last_used_time but I think it won't be much different from
> > > > > last_active_time.
> > > >
> > > > I don't understand the bit about updating it each time WAL record
> > > > decoding is happening. If it's the last active time, and the slot is
> > > > currently active, then the answer is either "right now" or "currently
> > > > undefined." I'd expect to see NULL in the system view in such a case.
> > > > And if that's so, then there's nothing to update each time a record is
> > > > decoded, because it's just still going to show NULL.
> > > >
> > >
> > > IIUC, Bertrand's point was that users can interpret last_active_time
> > > as a value that gets updated each time they decode a change which is
> > > not what we are doing. So, this can confuse users. Your expectation of
> > > answer (NULL) when the slot is active is correct and that is what will
> > > happen.
> >
> > Yeah, and so would be the confusion: why is last_active_time NULL while one is
> > using the slot?
> >
> 
> It is because we set it to zero when we acquire the slot and that
> value will remain the same till the slot is active. I am not sure if I
> understood your question so what I am saying might not make sense.

There is no "real" question, I was just highlighting the confusion in case we
name the field "last_active_time".

Regards,

-- 
Bertrand Drouvot
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com