Re: Introduce XID age and inactive timeout based replication slot invalidation
| От | Bertrand Drouvot |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Introduce XID age and inactive timeout based replication slot invalidation |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | ZfgTf77NL2xOSldF@ip-10-97-1-34.eu-west-3.compute.internal обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Introduce XID age and inactive timeout based replication slot invalidation (Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Introduce XID age and inactive timeout based replication slot invalidation
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On Sat, Mar 16, 2024 at 09:29:01AM +0530, Bharath Rupireddy wrote:
> Please see the attached v11 patch set with all the above review
> comments addressed.
Thanks!
Looking at 0001:
1 ===
+ True if this logical slot conflicted with recovery (and so is now
+ invalidated). When this column is true, check
Worth to add back the physical slot mention "Always NULL for physical slots."?
2 ===
@@ -1023,9 +1023,10 @@ CREATE VIEW pg_replication_slots AS
L.wal_status,
L.safe_wal_size,
L.two_phase,
- L.conflict_reason,
+ L.conflicting,
L.failover,
- L.synced
+ L.synced,
+ L.invalidation_reason
What about making invalidation_reason close to conflict_reason?
3 ===
- * Maps a conflict reason for a replication slot to
+ * Maps a invalidation reason for a replication slot to
s/a invalidation/an invalidation/?
4 ===
While at it, shouldn't we also rename "conflict" to say "invalidation_cause" in
InvalidatePossiblyObsoleteSlot()?
5 ===
+ * rows_removed and wal_level_insufficient are only two reasons
s/are only two/are the only two/?
Regards,
--
Bertrand Drouvot
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: