On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 11:25:44AM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 9:08 AM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
>> Hence, how about something like that:
>> "The logical replication launcher is disabled during binary upgrades,
>> as a logical replication workers running on the cluster upgrading from
>> could cause replication origins to move forward after they are copied
>> to the cluster upgrading to, creating potentially conflicts with the
>> physical files copied over."
>
> Looks better. One minor nitpick: /potentially/potential
Sure, WFM. Let's wait a bit and see if others have more comments to
offer.
--
Michael