Re: Timestamp reverse engeneering bug

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Dave Page
Тема Re: Timestamp reverse engeneering bug
Дата
Msg-id ZTXY9JNw63gt.HqCkFHv1@mail.vale-housing.co.uk
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Timestamp reverse engeneering bug  (Jean-Michel POURE <jm.poure@freesurf.fr>)
Ответы Re: Timestamp reverse engeneering bug
Список pgadmin-hackers
I'm using my phone right now so I can't check, but I'm pretty sure that's not a bug. Isn't timestamptz a timestamp with
timezonee.g. 2002-02-21 19:00:00+00? 

Anyway, pgAdmin gets this by looking up the typename from pg_type using pg_attribute.atttypid (iirc) so if it's broken
forone type it probably would be for all types. 

I'll check when I can...

Regards, Dave

_____________Original message ____________
Subject:    [pgadmin-hackers] Timestamp reverse engeneering bug
Sender:    Jean-Michel POURE <jm.poure@freesurf.fr>
Date:        Thu, 21 Feb 2002 18:57:05 +0000

Hi Dave,

Table definition with timestamps under 7.2 return "timestamptz".

Cheers,
Jean-Michel POURE

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly



В списке pgadmin-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Jean-Michel POURE
Дата:
Сообщение: Timestamp reverse engeneering bug
Следующее
От: Jean-Michel POURE
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Timestamp reverse engeneering bug