On Mon, Oct 9, 2023 at 04:36:20PM -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2023-10-09 19:26:54 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 9, 2023 at 04:08:05PM -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> > > There's an alternative approach we could take, which is to write in 4KB
> > > increments, while keeping 8KB pages. With the current format that's not
> > > obviously a bad idea. But given there aren't really advantages in 8KB WAL
> > > pages, it seems we should just go for 4KB?
> >
> > How do we handle shorter maximum row lengths and shorter maximum index
> > entry lengths?
>
> The WAL blocksize shouldn't influence either, unless we have a bug somewhere.
Oh, good point.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com
Only you can decide what is important to you.