Re: wal recycling problem

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Christoph Moench-Tegeder
Тема Re: wal recycling problem
Дата
Msg-id ZRW-7CMzr8HW72ry@elch.exwg.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на wal recycling problem  (Fabrice Chapuis <fabrice636861@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: wal recycling problem  (Fabrice Chapuis <fabrice636861@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
## Fabrice Chapuis (fabrice636861@gmail.com):

> We have a cluster of 2 members (1 primary and 1 standby) with Postgres
> version 14.9 and 2 barman server, slots are only configured for barman,
> barman is version 3.7.

The obvious question here is: can both of those barmans keep up with
your database, or are you seeing WAL retention due to exactly these
replication slots? (Check pg_replication_slots).

Regards,
Christoph

-- 
Spare Space



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Jeff Davis
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Invalidate the subscription worker in cases where a user loses their superuser status
Следующее
От: Justin Pryzby
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade failed with error - ERROR: column "a" in child table must be marked NOT NULL