On Fri, Sep 01, 2023 at 11:08:51AM -0700, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> > This should probably give a distinct error when syncfs is not supported
> > than when it's truely recognized.
>
> Later versions of the patch should have this.
Oops, right.
> > The patch should handle pg_dumpall, too.
>
> It looks like pg_dumpall only ever fsyncs a single file, so I don't think
> it is really needed there.
What about (per git grep no-sync doc) pg_receivewal?
--
Justin