Re: should frontend tools use syncfs() ?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Paquier
Тема Re: should frontend tools use syncfs() ?
Дата
Msg-id ZOQUSbi8bD1nhxb4@paquier.xyz
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: should frontend tools use syncfs() ?  (Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: should frontend tools use syncfs() ?  (Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 06:44:07PM -0700, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> I'm hoping there's a simpler path forward here.  pg_rewind only needs the
> following lines from fd.h:
>
>     /* Filename components */
>     #define PG_TEMP_FILES_DIR "pgsql_tmp"
>     #define PG_TEMP_FILE_PREFIX "pgsql_tmp"
>
> Maybe we could move these to file_utils.h instead.  WDYT?

I guess so..  At the same time, something can be said about
pg_checksums that redeclares PG_TEMP_FILE_PREFIX and PG_TEMP_FILES_DIR
because it does not want to include fd.h and its sync routines.
--
Michael

Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Peter Smith
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PoC] pg_upgrade: allow to upgrade publisher node
Следующее
От: Nathan Bossart
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: should frontend tools use syncfs() ?