Re: [PATCH] Add loongarch native checksum implementation.

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Paquier
Тема Re: [PATCH] Add loongarch native checksum implementation.
Дата
Msg-id ZMCQDL0wTy0/dLoQ@paquier.xyz
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [PATCH] Add loongarch native checksum implementation.  (John Naylor <john.naylor@enterprisedb.com>)
Ответы Re: [PATCH] Add loongarch native checksum implementation.  (Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>)
Re: [PATCH] Add loongarch native checksum implementation.  (YANG Xudong <yangxudong@ymatrix.cn>)
Re: [PATCH] Add loongarch native checksum implementation.  (John Naylor <john.naylor@enterprisedb.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jul 05, 2023 at 02:11:02PM +0700, John Naylor wrote:
> Also, please don't top-post (which means: quoting an entire message, with
> new text at the top) -- it clutters our archives.
>
> Before I look at this again: Are there any objections to another CRC
> implementation for the reason of having no buildfarm member?

The performance numbers presented upthread for the CRC computations
are kind of nice in this environment, but honestly I have no idea how
much this architecture is used.  Perhaps that's only something in
China?  I am not seeing much activity around that in Japan, for
instance, and that's really close.

Anyway, based on today's state of the buildfarm, we have a buildfarm
member named cisticola that should be able to test this new CRC
implementation, so I see no problem in applying this stuff now if you
think it is in good shape.
--
Michael

Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: YANG Xudong
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PATCH] Add loongarch native checksum implementation.
Следующее
От: Nathan Bossart
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PATCH] Add function to_oct