Re: Add TOAST support for more system tables

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Paquier
Тема Re: Add TOAST support for more system tables
Дата
Msg-id ZLYj+IwSyyYw8Cu4@paquier.xyz
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Add TOAST support for more system tables  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Add TOAST support for more system tables  (Sofia Kopikova <s.kopikova@postgrespro.ru>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 06:31:04PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Sofia Kopikova <s.kopikova@postgrespro.ru> writes:
> > This patch adds TOAST support for system tables pg_class,
> > pg_attribute and pg_largeobject_metadata, as they include ACL columns,
> > which may be potentially large in size.
>
> We have been around on this topic before, cf discussion leading up to
> commit 96cdeae07.  Allowing toasted data in pg_class or pg_attribute
> seems quite scary to me because of the potential for recursive access,
> particularly during cache-flush scenarios.  (That is, you need to be
> able to read those catalogs on the way to fetching a toasted value,
> so how can you be sure that doesn't devolve into an infinite loop?)

Yep.  I have something to add here.  The last time I poked at that, I
was wondering about two code paths that have specific comments on this
matter.  Based on my notes:
1) finish_heap_swap() in cluster.c:
     * pg_class doesn't have a toast relation, so we don't need to update the
     * corresponding toast relation. Not that there's little point moving all
     * relfrozenxid updates here since swap_relation_files() needs to write to
     * pg_class for non-mapped relations anyway.
2) extract_autovac_opts() in autovacuum.c:
 * we acquired the pg_class row.  If pg_class had a TOAST table, this would
 * be a risk; fortunately, it doesn't.

What has been posted makes zero adjustments in these areas.
--
Michael

Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Masahiko Sawada
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Support logical replication of DDLs
Следующее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Support logical replication of DDLs