On Thu, Jun 08, 2023 at 10:57:55AM +0900, Masahiro Ikeda wrote:
> (Excuse me for cutting in, and this is not directly related to the thread.)
> +1. I'm interested in the feature.
>
> This is just a example and it probable be useful for other users. IMO, at
> least, it's better to improve the specification that "Extension"
> wait event type has only the "Extension" wait event.
I hope that nobody would counter-argue you here. In my opinion, we
should just introduce an API that allows extensions to retrieve wait
event numbers that are allocated by the backend under
PG_WAIT_EXTENSION, in a fashion similar to GetNamedLWLockTranche().
Say something like:
int GetExtensionWaitEvent(const char *wait_event_name);
I don't quite see a design where extensions could rely on their own
numbers statically assigned by the extension maintainers, as this is
most likely going to cause conflicts. And I would guess that a lot of
external code would want to get more data pushed to pg_stat_activity,
meaning a lot of conflicts, potentially.
--
Michael