On Wed, Mar 12, 2025 at 01:56:04PM +0700, John Naylor wrote:
> The change here seems fine. My only quibble is that this sentence now
> seems out of place: "Option --analyze-in-stages can be used to
> generate minimal statistics quickly." I'm thinking we should make a
> clearer separation for with and without the --no-statistics option
> specified.
I think the recommendation stays the same regardless of whether
--no-statistics was used. --missing-only should do the right think either
way. But I do agree that this paragraph feels a bit haphazard. I modified
it to call out the full command for both --analyze-only and
--analyze-in-stages, and I moved the note about --jobs to its own sentence
and made it clear that it is applicable to both of the suggested vacuumdb
commands.
--
nathan