Re: Overeager spam fighting for link?
От | Julien Rouhaud |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Overeager spam fighting for link? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Z7UwEEbiuV0m6PJR@jrouhaud обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Overeager spam fighting for link? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Overeager spam fighting for link?
|
Список | pgsql-www |
On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 07:51:01PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com> writes: > >> The spam filtering[1] that occurs for the header information appears to > >> have been applied to the bottom link as well - making it 404. Not sure > >> where that is getting applied, but doing a "raw source" and checking my > >> original inbox seems to indicate the link at the bottom of the email was > >> sent unobscured. > > > FWIW I confirm that I did send a valid / unobscured link. > > IME the trick to keeping this from happening is to manually convert > any "@" characters in the URL you send to "%40". Usually if you > copy-and-paste from your browser address bar that happens for free. That's what I usually do. I guess that time I just copied the link from some email header.
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: