Re: Track the amount of time waiting due to cost_delay
От | Bertrand Drouvot |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Track the amount of time waiting due to cost_delay |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Z6w9YNNkliWJzP2e@ip-10-97-1-34.eu-west-3.compute.internal обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Track the amount of time waiting due to cost_delay (Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi, On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 04:42:26PM -0600, Nathan Bossart wrote: > On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 08:51:15AM +0000, Bertrand Drouvot wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 02:52:46PM -0600, Nathan Bossart wrote: > >> Off-list, I've asked Bertrand to gauge the feasibility of adding this > >> information to the autovacuum logs and to VACUUM/ANALYZE (VERBOSE). IMHO > >> those are natural places to surface this information, and I want to ensure > >> that we're not painting ourselves into a corner with the approach we're > >> using for the progress views. > > > > Yeah, I looked at it and that looks as simmple as 0003 attached (as that's the > > leader that is doing the report in case of parallel workers being used). > > > > 0001 and 0002 remain unchanged. > > Thanks. I've committed 0001 and 0002. Thanks! Regarding 0003 I think it's ok to keep it in this thread (and not create a dedicated one), as it still fits well with $SUBJECT (and the folks interested in are probably already part of this thread). Sounds good to you? Regards, -- Bertrand Drouvot PostgreSQL Contributors Team RDS Open Source Databases Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: