Re: Backport of CVE-2024-10978 fix to older pgsql versions (11, 9.6, and 9.4)
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Backport of CVE-2024-10978 fix to older pgsql versions (11, 9.6, and 9.4) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Z3RUS71dsBeB17DU@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Backport of CVE-2024-10978 fix to older pgsql versions (11, 9.6, and 9.4) (Roberto C. Sánchez <roberto@debian.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Backport of CVE-2024-10978 fix to older pgsql versions (11, 9.6, and 9.4)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Dec 31, 2024 at 03:19:25PM -0500, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > On Tue, Dec 31, 2024 at 02:46:37PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > Good question. In a way, if the person who made the change sees your > > request and can answer it easily, it makes sense to ask. However, I > > don't know the odds of that happening. > > > > I would say ask, but don't take it personally if it your request is > > ignored. We have fatigue about all the backpatching we have to do so it > > is hard to get motivated enough to research EOL branches. > > > That's helpful feedback. > > I definitely didn't take it personally this time and won't in the future > either. > > My thinking was "ask once, bump the thread once after 2 or 3 weeks just > in case it got lost in the noise (this is a busy list), and after that > let the matter rest if there is no answer". We don't normally ignore emails, so would not bother with a second request. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> https://momjian.us EDB https://enterprisedb.com Do not let urgent matters crowd out time for investment in the future.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: