Re: Fix early elog(FATAL)

On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 10:14:43PM -0600, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 07:15:05PM -0800, Noah Misch wrote:
>> I don't feel strongly either way.  I did write it the option-1 way originally.
>> Then I started thinking about changes at a distance causing the other
>> InitProcessGlobals() tasks to palloc or elog.  We could do option-1 in master
>> and keep the back branches in their current state.
> 
> I don't feel strongly either way, either.  I don't think it's important
> enough to diverge from the back-branches.

Also, thank you for fixing this.

-- 
nathan