On Mon, Mar 24, 2025 at 09:50:36AM +0900, Richard Guo wrote:
> Nice catch. The fix looks good to me. It seems to me that it's fine
> to go without a test case, since the fix is quite straightforward.
One could argue about using an injection point to force trick the
iteration loop to be cheaper, but I could not really get excited about
the coverage vs the cycles spent for it..
--
Michael