Re: [small patch] Change datatype of ParallelMessagePending from "volatile bool" to "volatile sig_atomic_t"

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Paquier
Тема Re: [small patch] Change datatype of ParallelMessagePending from "volatile bool" to "volatile sig_atomic_t"
Дата
Msg-id YzJFhqG1/1zHhV7u@paquier.xyz
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [small patch] Change datatype of ParallelMessagePending from "volatile bool" to "volatile sig_atomic_t"  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Ответы RE: [small patch] Change datatype of ParallelMessagePending from "volatile bool" to "volatile sig_atomic_t"  ("kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com" <kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 04:50:36PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> You are right.  bool is not usually a problem in a signal handler, but
> sig_atomic_t is the type we ought to use.  I'll go adjust that.

Done this one.  I have scanned the code, but did not notice a similar
mistake.  It is worth noting that we have only one remaining "volatile
bool" in the headers now.
--
Michael
Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Refactor backup related code (was: Is it correct to say, "invalid data in file \"%s\"", BACKUP_LABEL_FILE in do_pg_backup_stop?)
Следующее
От: Peter Smith
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: GUC values - recommended way to declare the C variables?