Greetings,
* Wolfgang Walther (walther@technowledgy.de) wrote:
> Robert Haas:
> > I don't think we're going to be very happy if we redefine inheriting
> > the privileges of another role to mean inheriting only some of them.
> > That seems pretty counterintuitive to me. I also think that this
> > particular definition is pretty fuzzy.
>
> Scratch my previous suggestion. A new, less fuzyy definition would be:
> Ownership is not a privilege itself and as such not inheritable.
One of the reasons the role system was brought into being was explicitly
to allow other roles to have ownership-level rights on objects that they
didn't directly own.
I don't see us changing that.
Thanks,
Stephen