Re: Inconvenience of pg_read_binary_file()

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Paquier
Тема Re: Inconvenience of pg_read_binary_file()
Дата
Msg-id YuSZTsoBMObyY+vT@paquier.xyz
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Inconvenience of pg_read_binary_file()  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 03:44:25PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Pushed after some fooling with the docs and test cases.  (Notably,
> I do not think we can assume that pg_hba.conf exists in $PGDATA; some
> installations keep it elsewhere.  I used postgresql.auto.conf instead.)

Are you sure that this last part is a good idea?  We don't force the
creation of postgresql.auto.conf when starting a server, so this
impacts the portability of the tests with installcheck if one decides
to remove it from the data folder, and it sounds plausible to me that
some distributions do exactly that..

I guess that you could rely on config_file or hba_file instead.
--
Michael

Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pg15b2: large objects lost on upgrade
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Inconvenience of pg_read_binary_file()