Re: avoid multiple hard links to same WAL file after a crash
| От | Michael Paquier | 
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: avoid multiple hard links to same WAL file after a crash | 
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | YsORtfT4+fXj/i1V@paquier.xyz обсуждение исходный текст | 
| Ответ на | Re: avoid multiple hard links to same WAL file after a crash (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>) | 
| Ответы | Re: avoid multiple hard links to same WAL file after a crash Back-patch of: avoid multiple hard links to same WAL file after a crash | 
| Список | pgsql-hackers | 
On Thu, May 05, 2022 at 08:10:02PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > I'd agree with removing all the callers at the end. pgrename() is > quite robust on Windows, but I'd keep the two checks in > writeTimeLineHistory(), as the logic around findNewestTimeLine() would > consider a past TLI history file as in-use even if we have a crash > just after the file got created in the same path by the same standby, > and the WAL segment init part. Your patch does that. As v16 is now open for business, I have revisited this change and applied 0001 to change all the callers (aka removal of the assertion for the WAL receiver when it overwrites a TLI history file). The commit log includes details about the reasoning of all the areas changed, for clarity, as of the WAL recycling part, the TLI history file part and basic_archive. -- Michael
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: