Re: Multi-Master Logical Replication

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruce Momjian
Тема Re: Multi-Master Logical Replication
Дата
Msg-id YplnGNzSivpAePPl@momjian.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Multi-Master Logical Replication  (Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Multi-Master Logical Replication  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jun  2, 2022 at 05:12:49PM +1000, Peter Smith wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 2, 2022 at 12:03 AM Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jun  1, 2022 at 10:27:27AM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> ...
> 
> > My big point is that you should not be showing up with a patch but
> > rather have these discussions to get agreement that this is the
> > direction the community wants to go.
> 
> The purpose of posting the POC patch was certainly not to present a
> fait accompli design/implementation.
> 
> We wanted to solicit some community feedback about the desirability of
> the feature, but because LRG is complicated to describe we felt that
> having a basic functional POC might help to better understand the
> proposal. Also, we thought the ability to experiment with the proposed
> API could help people to decide whether LRG is something worth
> pursuing or not.

I don't think the POC is helping, and I am not sure we really want to
support this style of architecture due to its complexity vs other
options.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        https://momjian.us
  EDB                                      https://enterprisedb.com

  Indecision is a decision.  Inaction is an action.  Mark Batterson




В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: convert libpq uri-regress tests to tap test
Следующее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pgsql: Use pre-fetching for ANALYZE