Re: Rewriting the test of pg_upgrade as a TAP test - take three - remastered set

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Paquier
Тема Re: Rewriting the test of pg_upgrade as a TAP test - take three - remastered set
Дата
Msg-id YnyawnlheodeuFfS@paquier.xyz
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Rewriting the test of pg_upgrade as a TAP test - take three - remastered set  (Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>)
Ответы Re: Rewriting the test of pg_upgrade as a TAP test - take three - remastered set  (Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 10:32:55PM -0700, Noah Misch wrote:
> Why did you discontinue testing the longstanding test database name?

I am not sure what you mean here.  Are you saying that the test should
be changed to prefix each database name by "regression", as it was the
case in test.sh?  Or do you mean that the backslash/double-quote
business should only apply to the first database name and not the
other two, implying that the new generate_db() in 002_pg_upgrade.pl
had better have a $prefix and a $suffix like it was originally
written?
--
Michael

Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Amit Langote
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: First draft of the PG 15 release notes
Следующее
От: Tatsuo Ishii
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: gitmaster access