On Sat, Apr 09, 2022 at 10:31:17AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Christoph Berg <myon@debian.org> writes:
>
> > I would think that if \dconfig showed the non-default settings only,
> > it would be much more useful; the full list would still be available
> > with "\dconfig *". This is in line with \dt only showing tables on the
> > search_path, and "\dt *.*" showing all.
>
> Hm, I could get on board with that -- any other opinions?
+1 for it, that's often what I'm interested in when looking at the GUCs in
general.
> (Perhaps there's an argument for omitting "override"
> settings as well?)
-0.1. Most are usually not useful, but I can see at least data_checksums and
wal_buffers that are still interesting.