Re: dfmgr additional ABI version fields

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Paquier
Тема Re: dfmgr additional ABI version fields
Дата
Msg-id YZdZPPoIRTkgnGzH@paquier.xyz
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: dfmgr additional ABI version fields  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: dfmgr additional ABI version fields  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 12:50:38PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> I'm not a different vendor, but I do work on different code than you
> do, and I like this. Advanced Server accidentally dodges this problem
> at present by shipping with a different FUNC_MAX_ARGS value, but this
> is much cleaner.

I am pretty sure that Greenplum could benefit from something like
that.  As a whole, using a string looks like a good idea for that.

> Would it be reasonable to consider something similar for the control
> file, for the benefit of distributions that are not the same on disk?

Hmm.  Wouldn't that cause more harm than actual benefits?
--
Michael

Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: wait event and archive_command
Следующее
От: Fujii Masao
Дата:
Сообщение: issue in pgfdw_report_error()?