Re: wait event and archive_command

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Paquier
Тема Re: wait event and archive_command
Дата
Msg-id YZXL2dB7x3NsCWDr@paquier.xyz
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: wait event and archive_command  (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 11:23:17AM +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
> Yes, that's possible. But isn't it uglier to make ExecuteRecoveryCommand() have
> the map of command name and wait event? So I feel inclined to avoid adding
> something like the following code into the function... Thought?

FWIW, I find cleaner, and less bug-prone, the approach taken by
Fujii-san's patch to have the wait event set as an argument of the
function rather than trying to guess it from the command data.
--
Michael
Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Amit Kapila
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Failed transaction statistics to measure the logical replication progress
Следующее
От: "houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com"
Дата:
Сообщение: RE: Skipping logical replication transactions on subscriber side