Re: More business with $Test::Builder::Level in the TAP tests

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Paquier
Тема Re: More business with $Test::Builder::Level in the TAP tests
Дата
Msg-id YWLL9EYFMDP3MKQc@paquier.xyz
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: More business with $Test::Builder::Level in the TAP tests  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Ответы Re: More business with $Test::Builder::Level in the TAP tests  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Oct 08, 2021 at 12:14:57PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> I think we need to be more explicit about it, especially w.r.t. indirect
> calls. Every subroutine in the call stack below where you want to error
> reported as coming from should contain this line.

Hmm.  I got to think about that for a couple of days, and the
simplest, still the cleanest, phrasing I can come up with is that:
This should be incremented by any subroutine part of a stack calling
test routines from Test::More, like ok() or is().

Perhaps you have a better suggestion?
--
Michael

Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Etsuro Fujita
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Transactions involving multiple postgres foreign servers, take 2
Следующее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Time to upgrade buildfarm coverage for some EOL'd OSes?