On Sun, Jul 25, 2021 at 12:28:04PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
>> We really ought to just remove every single use of long.
>
> I have no objection to that as a long-term goal. But I'm not volunteering
> to do all the work, and in any case it wouldn't be a back-patchable fix.
> I feel that we do need to do something about this performance regression
> in v13.
Another idea may be to be more aggressive in c.h? A tweak there would
be dirtier than marking long as deprecated, but that would be less
invasive. Any of that is not backpatchable, of course..
> No, I don't like that. Using size_t for memory-size variables is good
> discipline. Moreover, I'm not convinced that even with 64-bit ints,
> overflow would be impossible in all the places I fixed here. They're
> multiplying several potentially very large values (one of which
> is a float). I think this is just plain sloppy coding, independently
> of which bit-width you choose to be sloppy in.
Yeah, using size_t where adapted is usually a good idea.
--
Michael