Re: More time spending with "delete pending"

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Paquier
Тема Re: More time spending with "delete pending"
Дата
Msg-id YOfkMRNtMjyDLnLL@paquier.xyz
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: More time spending with "delete pending"  (Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: More time spending with "delete pending"
Список pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jul 08, 2021 at 11:00:00PM +0300, Alexander Lakhin wrote:
> Beside the aforementioned test I can only propose the extended patch,
> that incorporates the undo of the changes brought by bed90759f.
> With this patch that test is passed.

Checked and confirmed.  It is a nice test with IPC::Run you have here.
Making things in win32stat.c more consistent with open.c surely is
appealing.  One thing that I'd like to introduce in this patch, and
also mentioned upthread, is to change the stat() call in open.c to use
microsoft_native_stat().

I have let pgbench run for a couple of hours with some concurrent
activity using genfile.c, without noticing problems.  My environment
is not representative of everything we can find out there on Windows,
but it brings some confidence.
--
Michael

Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum
Следующее
От: Amul Sul
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: when the startup process doesn't (logging startup delays)