Re: SSL/TLS instead of SSL in docs

On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 01:53:47PM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> The attached v3 does it this way.

Thanks.  Mostly what was on message upthread.  Applied this one.

> Yes, there are a few but not too many.  Whenever the protocol is refererred to
> and not the concept of an encrypted connection, just the applicable term is
> used.

Makes sense.

> The attached v3 wraps SSL/TLS in a single acronym block, which for sure is more
> pleasing to the eye when working with the docs, but I still have no idea which
> version technically is the most correct.

I am not sure 100% sure, but I would still vote in favor of this
change, perhaps with a small addition of one extra entry for SSL/TLS
directly on the acronym's page for consistency.  What you have here
sounds rather fine to me.

> It doesn't, I'm just not convinced that the acronyms page is consulted all too
> frequently anymore to provide much value.  I might be totally wrong though.
> Either way, thats (potentially) for a separate discussion.

No idea about that.
--
Michael