Re: PXGS vs TAP tests

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Paquier
Тема Re: PXGS vs TAP tests
Дата
Msg-id YNEtji2XqUGxcf9r@paquier.xyz
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: PXGS vs TAP tests  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Ответы Re: PXGS vs TAP tests  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Jun 20, 2021 at 01:24:04PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Tests pass with the attached patch, which puts the setting in the
> Makefile for the recovery tests. The script itself doesn't need any
> changing.

+REGRESS_SHLIB=$(abs_top_builddir)/src/test/regress/regress$(DLSUFFIX)
+export REGRESS_SHLIB
It may be better to add a comment here explaning why REGRESS_SHLIB is
required in this Makefile then?

While on it, could we split those commands into multiple lines and
reduce the noise of future diffs?  Something as simple as that would
make those prove commands easier to follow:
+cd $(srcdir) && TESTDIR='$(CURDIR)' \
+   $(with_temp_install) \
+   PGPORT='6$(DEF_PGPORT)' \
+   PG_REGRESS='$(CURDIR)/$(top_builddir)/src/test/regress/pg_regress' \
+   REGRESS_SHLIB= '$(abs_top_builddir)/src/test/regress/regress$(DLSUFFIX)' \
+   $(PROVE) $(PG_PROVE_FLAGS) $(PROVE_FLAGS) $(if $(PROVE_TESTS),$(PROVE_TESTS),t/*.pl)

There are other places where this could happen, but the TAP commands
are particularly long.
--
Michael

Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Justin Pryzby
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Different compression methods for FPI
Следующее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pgbench logging broken by time logic changes