On Sun, Jun 13, 2021 at 07:36:54AM +0100, Geoff Winkless wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Jun 2021, 15:35 Alvaro Herrera, <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote:
>> src/backend/libpq/auth.c:847: * has. If it's an MD5 hash, we must do
>> MD5 authentication, and if it's a
>> src/backend/libpq/auth.c:848: * SCRAM secret, we must do SCRAM
>> authentication.
>
> Not sure whether you were just listing examples and you weren't suggesting
> this should be changed, but surely "SCRAM" is pronounced "scram" and is
> thus "a SCRAM"?
RFC 5802 uses "a SCRAM something" commonly, but "a SCRAM" alone does
not make sense:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc5802
The sentences quoted above look fine to me.
--
Michael