Re: [PATCH] We install pg_regress and isolationtester but not pg_isolation_regress

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Paquier
Тема Re: [PATCH] We install pg_regress and isolationtester but not pg_isolation_regress
Дата
Msg-id YIobCjdi1Wq2KyDi@paquier.xyz
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [PATCH] We install pg_regress and isolationtester but not pg_isolation_regress  (Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander@timescale.com>)
Ответы Re: [PATCH] We install pg_regress and isolationtester but not pg_isolation_regress
Список pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 12:44:45PM +0300, Aleksander Alekseev wrote:
> I just wanted to let you know that TimescaleDB uses
> pg_isolation_regress and occasionally there are reports from some
> suffering/puzzled users/developers, e.g. [1]. Not 100% sure if it
> makes investing the time into backpatching worth it. However if
> someone could do it, it would be nice.

FWIW, I am not really sure that this is important enough to justify a
back-patch, even it is true that there have been cases in the past
where extra binaries got added in minor releases.
--
Michael

Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: WIP: WAL prefetch (another approach)
Следующее
От: "tanghy.fnst@fujitsu.com"
Дата:
Сообщение: [BUG]"FailedAssertion" reported in lazy_scan_heap() when running logical replication